WIPING OVER OF THE SOCKS DURING WUDU

Praise be to Allah and May the peace and blessings of Allah be upon His beloved Messenger, his family and companions, and those that follow them in righteousness till the final day.

 

It is available from Hadith,

 

“I saw the Prophet(pbuh)  passing wet hands over his turban and Khuffs (leather socks).[1]

 

And,

 

“Jarir urinated, then performed ablution and wiped over the socks. It was said to him: “Do you do like this?” He said: “Yes, I saw that the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) urinated, then performed ablution and then wiped over his shoes.”[2] 

 

And it is reported in hadith from the book of Imam Ibn Hajr,

 

“I was with Prophet (pbuh) during an expedition. He started to perform ablution and I was about to remove his khuffs (socks), when he said, “Leave them, for I put them on while I was in a state of purity.” And he wiped over them.”[3] 

 

From the above Ahadith, it is clear the wiping over of the socks, which is worn in the stage of Ablution, i.e. wudu, is one of the Sunnah of our beloved Prophet (pbuh).

 

Dr. Bilal Philips in one of his lectures told that the Mutawattir Ahadith concerning this reaches 84 in numbers. The issue of acceptance of this Sunnah was taken so strictly that Imam At-Tahawi took its acceptance as an issue of Aqeedah (Islamic Creed) in his book ‘AQEEDAH AT-TAHAWIYYAH’, to make clear identification from the deviants, the Rafidah’s, who reject this Sunnah, which is proven by Mutawattir Ahadiths.

 

Imam At-Tahawi states in his Article 85 of Islamic Creed,

 

“We believe that it is correct to wipe over leather socks, whether one is traveling or resident, as has been mentioned in the hadith.” 

 

 

In the commentary of this book[4], Imam Ibn Al-Izz, said that if anybody doubts these ahadiths, than he should even more so doubt the verses about ablution, as ahadith for wiping over are far more in numbers compared to the verses for wudu in the Quran

 

 

Hence, the matter of wiping over of the khuffs (socks) can be summed up in following views of Imam Ahmad [http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/45535/socks];

  • It is an authentic Sunnah of our Prophet pbuh.
  • It is a concession from our Prophet pbuh.
  • It is a means of differentiating ourselves from the people of Bi’dah, the Rafidahs and Kharijis.

 

 

 

Following are the rulings from the Sunnah of our beloved Prophet (pbuh) concerning the wiping over of the socks;

 

 

1. Concerning the material of the socks, following is narrated by Umar RA in one of the hadith,

 

“When anyone of you performs ablution and puts his socks or khuffs on, he may wipe over them, perform prayers while wearing them and not take them off, if he so wishes, except in the case of (Janabah).”[5]

 

This hadith very clearly negates differentiating between the khuffs and socks and makes the wiping over of the normal socks same as wiping over of the khuffs. Hence, the misconception of some of the scholars that the socks shall be only of leather or very thick is unwarranted. Also Shaykh Sulayman Ibn Nasir Al-Awan in his Fatwa[6] related from Fatwa of Shaykh Ul-Islam Imam Ibn Taymiyyah, that socks refer to any normal ones that people wear in daily use. And in fatwa # 13954[7], Shaykh Salih Al-Munajjad, derived from statement of early scholars including that of Ibn Hazm and a saying of Ibn Umar who stated, “Wiping over the socks (jawrabayn) is like wiping over the leather slippers (khuffayn).” These Fatwa’s also clarify the position that the socks may have holes unless they are more than what are ordinarily acceptable. Also it is unanimous opinion of the scholars that the shoes, khuffs or socks should at least reach the ankles for the condition of wiping to be valid.

 

 

 

2. The socks should have been worn while the person is in a state of purity.

……… “Leave them, for I put them on while I was in a state of purity.” And he wiped over them.”[8] 

 

 

 

3. The wiping over of the socks shall be done on the upper part of the socks as stated in following hadith:

 “………. He wiped over the upper part of the socks and their lower part.”[9] 

 

And

 

 “If the religion were based on opinion, it would be more important to wipe the under part of the shoe than the upper but I have seen the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) wiping over the upper part of his shoes.”[10] 

 

Furthermore, right foot shall be wiped first, same as the condition of ablution and it is the view of Imam Salih Al-Fawzaan[11] that wiping should be performed passing from toes towards the leg and fingers while doing so should be open. Wiping should be done only once.

 

 

 

4. The time limit allowed for khuff/socks to be kept on for wiping for a resident shall be one day and one night and for a traveler, it shall be three days and three nights. Moreover, except the case when a person goes in the state of Janabah, wherein Ghusl becomes compulsory, socks may be worn full time, even at the time of sleeping and relieving oneself. These are derived from following ahadith,

“……. The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) stipulated (the upper limit) of three days and three nights for a traveler and one day and one night for the resident.”[12] 

 

And

 

“The messenger of Allah (pbuh) used to command us, when we were traveling not to take off our socks for three days and nights. We did not remove them unless we were in a state of post-sex impurity (janabah). We did not remove them on account of relieving ourselves (defecation), passing urine or sleeping.”[13] 

 

 

Another issue is that of the point of starting of the time limit of wiping of the socks. Again, Imam Salih Al-Fawzaan[14] is of the view that the time limit start from the time one breaks the wudu after having worn the socks (at the time within the stage of ritual purity, i.e. in state of wudu). This same view is also held by Shaykh Ibn Al Uthaymeen, in his Fatwa for this issue[15].

 

 

 

5. Lastly,the socks shall not be of the materials which are disallowed and illegal, like made of Silk or acquired illegally.

 

 

 

ALLAH KNOWS THE BEST,

 

 

 

I have tried my best to present to your all authentic information with proper refernces to the best of my ability and if i have made any mistake please do correct me. Anything good is from Allah and anything bad is from me and the shaytan. May Allah forgive me for any errors.Ameen!

 

 

 

**********************************************************************************

 

References - 

 

[1] Sahih Hadith Bukhari, – Vol 1, Hadith no. 204, narrated by Jafar Bin Amr on the authority of his Father

 

[2] Sahih Hadith Muslim – Ch. 15, Bk. 2, Hadith no. 520,  narrated by Hummam

 

[3] Bulugh Al-Maram, Hadith no. 63, Narrated by Al-Mughrrah Bin Shubah, agreed upon by Bukhari and Muslim

 

[4] Sharh Al-Aqidah At-Tahawiyyah, page no. 344-345

 

[5] Bulugh Al-Maram, Hadith no. 69, Narrated by Umar RA, and related by Ad-Darqutni and graded Sahih by Al-Hakim

 

[6] http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/8186/socks

 

[7] http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/13954/socks

 

[8] Bulugh Al-Maram, Hadith no. 63, agreed upon by Bukhari and Muslim

 

[9] Sunnan Abu-Dawood, Hadith no. 84, Narrated by Al-Mughirah Ibn Shu’bah

 

[10] Sunnan Abu-Dawood, Hadith no. 83, Narrated by Ali Ibn AbuTalib

 

[11] Summary of Islamic Jurisprudence, Vol 1, page 51

 

[12] Sahih Hadith Muslim – Ch. 17, Bk no. 2, Hadith no. 537,  Narrated by Shurayh Ibn Hani

 

[13] Bulugh Al-Maram, Hadith no. 66, Narrated by Safwan Bin Assal,  and related by An-Nasai and At-Tirmidhi accepted by Bukhari

 

[14] Summary of Islamic Jurisprudence, Vol 1, page 49

 

[15] http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/9640/socks

 

 

 

=============================================================

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY –

 

  • SUMMARY OF ISLAMIC JURISPUDENCE, VOL. 1 by Shaykh Salih Al-Fawzaan

 

  • FIQH US-SUNNAH by Sayyid Sabiq

 

  • BULUGH AL-MARAM MIN ADILLAT AL-AHKAM  by Imam Ibn Hajar

 

  • HADITH SAHIH BUKHARI

 

  • HADITH SAHIH MUSLIM

 

  • ALIM EDUCATION SOFTWARE (http://alim.org/)

 

  • http://www.islamqa.com/en/

 

 

 

Also read -

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=10&Topic=3815

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=10&Topic=9456&sortby=asc

 

GOOD AND EVIL OF DESTINY

Belief in Qadar is obligatory and it is one of the six pillars of faith (Refer Sahih Muslim hadeeth # 1). 

Nothing takes place in the universe without His permission. No good can be obtained nor harm avoided unless Allah decrees it. Although both good and evil are parts of Allaah’s creation, i.e., He is the creator of both good and evil, Allah does not attribute evil directly to Himself, because He is Good and all which comes from Him is Good. In the Qur’aan Allah enjoins humans to “… seek refuge in the Lord of the Dawn from the evil of what He created.” (Soorah al-Falaq, [113]: 1-2). He does not say: “from the evil He created”, instead He attributes the evil to His creation and not directly to Himself.

Furthermore, ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib related that in the Tahajjud prayer Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) used to say:

“…I hear Your call and am following Your religion, and all good is in Your two hands and the evil is not attributable to You…”
(Sahih Muslim, vol. 1, pp. 373, no. 1695)
The evil that comes from Allah is relative evil. It may be evil in one perspective but good from other perspectives.

Ibn al-Qayyim said regarding this concept:

“Allaah does not create anything purely evil from all perspectives. His wisdom rejects that. Creation may be evil and corruptive from some respects, yet in it are benefits, wisdom, and greater considerations than its corrupt aspects. Existence of evil is limited to that. It is not possible from the Lord’s perspective for Him to want something which is corrupt in all respects, there being absolutely no benefit in its creation. This concept is among the most obvious impossibilities. For good is in Allah’s hand and evil is not His, instead all that is His is good. Evil only exists due to the absence of its being related to Him. For if it was His it would not be evil.” (Madaarij as-Saalikeen, pp. 199-200)

For example, sunshine is essential for plants to grow and synthesize chlorophyll, yet in some places it causes the rivers and lakes to dry up leading to drought, famine and death. Rain is also essential for plants to grow; yet on some occasions it also causes floods, drowning and death.

Pure evil, on the other hand, is a result of human activity.

Humans think evil and, if Allah permits it, they do evil. However, if Allah permits them to do evil, there must be a beneficial side to it known to Allaah. Allaah has informed His creatures that He does not oppress anyone.

“Your Lord does no wrong to anyone.”
Soorah al-Kahf, (18): 49

Human beings often do things which would be considered evil, not for the evil itself but for the expected good to come from the evil. For example, the act of slashing open someone’s chest and extracting his heart would be considered evil and cruel, however, when done as a heart operation it is considered a great good. Human beings are responsible for their evil because it is a product of their choice.

Regarding God’s permission, Muslim scholars of the past have distinguished between God’s wish and His will.
  • His wish is sometimes referred to as His Legal Wish, meaning that He wishes for humans Islaam; the right way of life consisting of submission to whatever God has instructed. However, He also gave humans the ability to accept His wish or reject it. Consequently, humans may go against God’s Legal Wish.
  • His will, on theother hand, is referred to as His Creational Will, meaning that what takes place is by his permission alone. Among the things which take place are events beyond human will and events which are in accordance with human will.  For example, humans are governed by the laws of “nature” which they cannot escape. If one jumps up, he or she must fall back down. If one’s knee is struck by the doctor, the foot kicks out, no matter how hard the mind fights the reaction. Humans cannot go against Allah’s Creational Will.

Shaykh Al-‘Uthaymeen stated regarding the good and evil of destiny,

“Its good and evil is relative to the final consequence. The good of destiny is what is beneficial and its evil is what is harmful or hurtful. Its good and evil is relative to the one for whom it is destined and the final result. Some of it is good like acts of worship, good health, wealth and some of it is evil like acts of disobedience, sickness, poverty. Relative to Allaah’s action it cannot be said to be evil based on the Prophet’s supplication in Qunoot which he taught al-Hasan ibn ‘Ali, “Protect me from the evil of what You have destined.” He attributed evil to what Allaah destined and not to Allaah’s destiny.”

=====================================================

Taken from the commentary on the book  “Lum‘atul-I‘tiqaad’ (Radiance of Faith) written by Imam Ibn Qudamah Al Maqdisi and commentary by Imam Ibn Uthaymeen and Dr. Bilal Philips.

PRINCIPLE OF QADAR AS SUMMED UP BY IMAM IBN AL-IZZ & REFUTATION OF THOSE WHO ERRED IN QADAR

Also read - http://mohammedirfan.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/four-pillars-levels-of-qadar-pre-destiny/

Qadr is the ordaining of things according to the knowledge Allah has of them.

It involves the following principles:

1. Allah knows things before they come into existence. This means that His knowledge is eternal. This statement is a refutation of those who deny that His knowledge is eternal.
2. Fore-ordainment (taqdeer ) is to fix the measures of things, namely the properties and attributes that they will have.
Allah has said:
“He created everything and destined its measure.” (Soorah al-Furqaan, [25]: 2)

This means that creation involves two kinds of pre-measurement: ordaining things as such or fixing their measures, and doing so before they come into existence. Since Allah has fixed the measures of things in all their details, qualitative and quantitative, His knowledge of each and every individual thing is perfect. Hence, those who think that Allah knows only the generalities and not the particulars are wrong. Qadr involves eternal knowledge as it involves the knowledge of each and every individual thing. [In trying to reconcile Allaah’s knowledge of the future and human free will, Allamah Muhammad Iqbal fell into this pit of denying an aspect of Allaah’s knowledge. He stated in his book Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam, (p. 79) that “The future certainly pre-exists in the organic whole of God’s creative life, but it pre-exists as an open possibility not as a fixed order of events with definite outlines … No doubt the emergence of egos endowed with the power to spontaneous and hence unforeseeable action is, in a sense, a limitation on the freedom of the all-inclusive Ego (i.e., Allah). But this limitation is not externally imposed. It is born out of His own creative freedom whereby He has chosen finite egos to be participators of His life power and freedom.”]

3. Qadr means that Allah reveals detailed information about things before their creation.

Therefore, it is not ruled out that some of His servants may know about various things before they are brought into existence – if Allah chooses to inform them. This further enforces the truth that their Creator must be even more knowledgeable about them. If He has informed His servants about them, He cannot Himself lack that knowledge.

4. Allah is free to decide what to do, or to create what He wills, and nothing is incumbent or obligatory upon Him.
5. Finally, it means that the things that He ordains are contingent, i.e., that they come into being after they were not there. He first determines their measures and then creates them.”

(Commentary on the Creed of at-Tahawi, pp. 219-220)

__________________________________________________________________________

There are two main groups who erred in Qadaa and Qadr.

1. The Jabrites who claimed that the creature is forced to do its acts without any choice on its part.
They are refuted by two points:

 

a) Allah attributed human acts to them and made them earning for which they are rewarded or punished. If they were forced to do them, the attribution of the acts to them would not be correct and punishment for them would be oppression.

 

b) Everyone knows the difference between an act of choice and a forced act in reality and in judgment. So if someone transgressed against another and claimed that he was forced to do it by Allaah’s Qadaa and Qadr it would be considered stupidity, contradicting what is known by necessity.
2. The Qadrites who claim that the creature is independent in its actions and that Allah has no will or power or creation in it.
Their claim is also refuted by two points:

 

a) Their claim contradicts Allaah’s statements:
“Allaah is the creator of everything.” (Soorah az-Zumar, [39]: 62)
“And Allah created you and what you do.” (Soorah as-Saaffaat, [37]: 96)

 

b) Allah is the owner of the heavens and earth. How is it possible that there be in His dominion things which are not dependent on His will and creation? (Sharh Lum‘atul-I‘tiqaad, pp. 96-7)

ALLAH KNOWS THE BEST

=====================================================

Taken the book  “Lum‘atul-I‘tiqaad’ (Radiance of Faith) written by Imam Ibn Qudamah Al Maqdisi and commentary by Imam Ibn Uthaymeen and Dr. Bilal Philips.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.